Betreff: Re: Fwd: Witness statement from one of ourr lawyers
Von: Yoram Chisik <ychisik@gmail.com>
Datum: 12.07.2018 16:37
An: Adrian David Cheok <adrian@imagineeringinstitute.org>
Kopie (CC): Leif Oppermann <leif.oppermann@fit.fraunhofer.de>, =?UTF-8?Q?Teresa_Rom=C3=A3o?= <tir@fct.unl.pt>, Masahiko INAMI <inami@inami.info>

ADRIAN,

AS A SON OF AN AUSCHWITZ SURVIVOR I TAKE PERSONAL AFRONT TO THIS USE OF LANGUAGE AND ITS USE TO ATTACK A MEMBER OF OUR COMMUNITY WHO CARES ABOUT ITS REPUTATION!

Regardless of your personal involvement with David Levy, in running the LSR conference and any other pursuits you might have that is your own business.

However as far as ACE is concerned you can not act by yourself (regardless of your current role and historical contribution) but must act in unison with the steering committee (of which I am a member).  You deliberatly tie ACE by claiming its co-located with LSR (which is a false statement since they occur at different dates) and thus with David Levy a fact we have not been consulted about but which we have raised more than once.

So far we have treated the matter with cotton gloves (despite your behavior and the tone of your last email - to which Leif was not privy) out of a feeling of loyalty and camaraderie to a person we considered our friend despite the fact that recent events and communication have made us physically ill! However there is a limit to everything and you have crossed every possible line.  This has gone long enough and must stop NOW

Since the ACE submission deadline is on Sunday (15) I suggest (only to use a polite term) we skype on Monday to discuss all pending issues regarding ACE and this escalating situation.  This will allow us to examine the submission status and for tempers to calm (all I will say is that its a good thing you are not in close proximity).

In the mean time I suggest (again only for the use of polite language) you do the following:

1. Provide admin access to the submission system to all steering committee members
2. Refllect on what you have wrote in this and previous emails
3. Seek some help in pursuing said reflcetion
4. Calmly phrase your appology not only to the recipients of this email but to the memory of the murdered souls you have invoked (that include several members of my immediate family)
5. Let us know what time on Monday will be good.  We all have research to conduct as well in case that has escaped your notice.

If you continue in your refusal to discuss this issue, which is your obligation towards the steering committee than rest assured a statement will be issued without any further consultation.

I shall now try to compose myself enough to continue writing the research paper I was writing for a deadline tomorrow, in the hope of having a nice weekend.  A hope that has now been shattered.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL WITH ANY FURTHER DIATRIBE FILLED MESSAGES SIMPLY COMPLETE THE LIST ABOVE AND

Yoram 

*************************************
Yoram Chisik
Researcher at Large and Sandwich Maker Extraordinaire
Free advice and opinions - refunds available.


On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:58 PM Adrian David Cheok <adrian@imagineeringinstitute.org> wrote:
Dear Leif

I suggest you directly deal with David Levy on this matter. No, I don't have time to examine each and every document as you are. I am too busy doing research. 

Why am I involved with your problem with David Levy? Similarly what has ACE got to do with this matter either? Please talk directly to him if you have a problem, that is the manly thing to do,  don't use me and ACE as your proxy.

I think your war against David Levy will not go down well. It will look really really bad for a German government funded researcher to attack a Jewish man who had many close relatives killed at Auschwitz, especially is has absolutely nothing to do with your life, or your lab, or your work.

Adrian Cheok 


On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, 20:54 Leif Oppermann <leif.oppermann@fit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Hi Adrian,

to the contrary: the presented witness statement shows, to some extent, what type of person David is.

To be more explicit:
- the document presented to you by David is an unsigned word document (*)
- but it bears a CLAIM NO: HC 2016 - 003314
- RCL/David lost that case(!) and has been convicted for it (to pay 52k GBP, which they failed to do)
- check http://retro-computers.co.uk/blog/q2-2017#20170517 , esp.
-- http://retro-computers.co.uk/assets/zxvega/default_costs_certificate/20170517_default_costs_certificate_1.jpg
-- http://retro-computers.co.uk/assets/zxvega/default_costs_certificate/20170517_default_costs_certificate_2.jpg
-- http://retro-computers.co.uk/assets/zxvega/default_costs_certificate/20170517_default_costs_certificate_3.jpg
-- http://retro-computers.co.uk/assets/zxvega/default_costs_certificate/20170517_default_costs_certificate_4.jpg
- it is the default costs certificate for that exact claim no., stamped by Senior Courts of England and Wales.

I am a critical rationalist, and I thought you were one, too. David obviously attempted to deceive you and us with this presented "proof", which kind of nicely prooves my point.
Q.E.D.

And it probably wasn't the only time he did that to you and the academic community that esp. you massively support him to reach. As a critical rationalist, I don't feel I should need to double-check the other presented documents. However, let me know if you think differently, or spotted an error in my argumentation. Afterall, we are all used to peer-review.

I think you have something to talk about now, both with David, and with your committee. You cannot just continue like that! If you continue to support David without a doubt, you are not third party, as you claimed. You are seriously harming your own integrity and that of other hard working academics (some of which are cc), as well as the community that we are all part of.

As such, I am still waiting for an official statement regarding ACE/LSR position on David Levy that is a bit better than your previous email which effectively told me to go away and that "everything is fine". I really hope to see a glimpse of that in public within a week.

Best,

Leif

*: Filename "Fourth Witness Statement of Jayne   Irene Clemens 7 February 2017 Draft..DOCX", md5 97BC309C2BAA1B32330433D71068668A

Am 10.07.2018 um 11:54 schrieb Adrian David Cheok:
FORWARD NUMBER ONE FROM DAVID LEVY

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Adrian David Cheok <adrian@imagineeringinstitute.org>
Date: Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 4:02 PM
Subject: Fwd: Witness statement from one of ourr lawyers
To: <leif.oppermann@fit.fraunhofer.de>



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David Levy <davidlevylondon@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 02:56
Subject: Witness statement from one of ourr lawyers
To: Adrian David Cheok <adriancheok@gmail.com>, Rasyidah Abd Rani <rasyidah@imagineeringinstitute.org>, Adrian David Cheok <adrian@imagineeringinstitute.org>


Hi Adrian,

This witness statement shows to some extent what type of person Andrews is.

Best,

David




-- 
Dr. Leif Oppermann
Mixed and Augmented Reality Solutions, Fraunhofer FIT
http://www.fit.fraunhofer.de/mars
Tel.: +49 (0)2241 - 14-2724